Znanstveni imperijalizam

Ovo je osnova ili početak budućeg članka.
Pomozite Wikipediji i dopunite ga.

Znanstveni imperijalizam je pojam kojeg je stvorio Dr. Ellis T. Powell prilikom svog govora u Commonwealth Club of Canada 8. rujna 1920. godine gdje ga je definirao imperijalizam kao 'svijest proizvoljne i namjerne dominacije nad ljudskim tijelima i dušama' dok je pojam 'znanstveni imperijalizam' objasnio kao 'podvrgivanje svih razvijenih i nerazvijenih snaga svijeta čovjekovom umu.^[1] John Dupré je nadodao da ljudi imaju običaj da ako neki znastveni model radi i ako je uspješan, da pojedinci, organizacije i država pokušavaju koristiti taj model na što više mogućih izazoa i problema, i opisao je te tendencije kao "opasnim".^[2] Ta objašnjenja su usporediva s kulturnim imperijalizom, i usporedivo s krutim i netolerantnim oblikom intelektualnog monoteizma.^[3] ^[4] ^[5]^[6]. Znanstveni imperijalizam se također naziva religijom intelektualaca, osobito kod onih intelektualaca koji drže vjerovanja da je zanstvena metoda pravovaljana za sve odluke u životu čovjeka. ^[7]

Izvori

↑ Scientific Imperialism an Address, govor Ellis T. Powell, LL.B. D.Sc.
↑ John Dupré: The Disunity of Science (2006) Interviewed by Paul Newall
↑ Donna Haraway (Autumn 1988). "Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective". Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–99. doi:10.2307/3178066. JSTOR 3178066
↑ http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0034-6705(199722)59%3A3%3C600%3ASAC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-N Scientism and Humanism: Two Cultures in Post-Mao China (1978-1989), by Shiping Hua & Science and Dissent in Post-Mao China: The Politics of Knowledge by H. Lyman Miller, Reviewed by Yan Sun, The Review of Politics, 59.3, Non-Western Political Thought (Summer, 1997), pp. 600–2
↑ http://www.springerlink.com/content/p72136812128u36w/ Garth D. Benson, Science Education from a Social Constructivist Position: A Worldview, Studies in Philosophy and Education, 20.5, September, 2001, pp.443-452
↑ Joseph Ben-David (srpnja 1972). "The Profession of Science and its Powers". Minerva 10 (3): 362–82. doi:10.1007/BF01556920. http://www.springerlink.com/content/mm661776827111h3/
↑ Staddon, J E R, "SCIENTIFIC IMPERIALISM AND BEHAVIORIST EPISTEMOLOGY," Behavior and Philosophy, 2004

[1] Scientific Imperialism an Address, govor Ellis T. Powell, LL.B. D.Sc.

[2] John Dupré: The Disunity of Science (2006) Interviewed by Paul Newall

[3] Donna Haraway (Autumn 1988). "Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective". Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–99. doi:10.2307/3178066. JSTOR 3178066

[4] ttp://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0034-6705(199722)59%3A3%3C600%3ASAC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-N Scientism and Humanism: Two Cultures in Post-Mao China (1978-1989), by Shiping Hua & Science and Dissent in Post-Mao China: The Politics of Knowledge by H. Lyman Miller, Reviewed by Yan Sun, The Review of Politics, 59.3, Non-Western Political Thought (Summer, 1997), pp. 600–2

[5] ttp://www.springerlink.com/content/p72136812128u36w/ Garth D. Benson, Science Education from a Social Constructivist Position: A Worldview, Studies in Philosophy and Education, 20.5, September, 2001, pp.443-452

[6] Joseph Ben-David (srpnja 1972). "The Profession of Science and its Powers". Minerva 10 (3): 362–82. doi:10.1007/BF01556920. http://www.springerlink.com/content/mm661776827111h3/

[7] Staddon, J E R, "SCIENTIFIC IMPERIALISM AND BEHAVIORIST EPISTEMOLOGY," Behavior and Philosophy, 2004

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]