Licencija MIT: razlika između inačica

Izvor: Hrvatska internetska enciklopedija
Prijeđi na navigaciju Prijeđi na pretraživanje
prevedeno s https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License + dodatci
 
Nema sažetka uređivanja
 
Redak 1: Redak 1:
'''Licencija MIT''' (eng. ''MIT License'') je [[permisivna softverska licencija|permisivna]] [[softverska licencija]] koja potječe s [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology|Massachusettskog instituta za tehnologiju]] (MIT)<ref>{{Cite book |last=Rosen |first=Lawrence E. |title=Open Source Licensing: Software Freedom and Intellectual Property Law |publisher=[[Prentice Hall PTR]] |year=2005 |isbn=0-13-148787-6 |location=Upper Saddle River, NJ |oclc=56012651}}</ref> iz vremena kasnih 1980-ih. <ref name="history">{{cite web |last=Haff |first=Gordon |title=The mysterious history of the MIT License |url=https://opensource.com/article/19/4/history-mit-license |access-date=2019-07-30 |work=opensource.com |quote=The date? The best single answer is probably 1987. But the complete story is more complicated and even a little mysterious. [...] Precursors from 1985. The X Consortium or X11 License variant from 1987. Or the Expat License from 1998 or 1999.}}</ref> Kao permisivna licencija, stavlja malo ograničenja na ponovnu uporabu i ima visoku [[kompatibilnost licencije]].<ref name="opensoucecomp">{{cite web|url=http://opensource.com/business/14/1/what-license-should-i-use-open-source-project |quote=Permissive licensing simplifies things One reason the business world, and more and more developers [...], favor permissive licenses is in the simplicity of reuse. The license usually only pertains to the source code that is licensed and makes no attempt to infer any conditions upon any other component, and because of this there is no need to define what constitutes a derived work. I have also never seen a license compatibility chart for permissive licenses; it seems that they are all compatible.|title=Should I use a permissive license? Copyleft? Or something in the middle? |date=2014-01-28 |access-date=2015-05-30 |first=Marcus D. |last=Hanwell |publisher=opensource.com}}</ref><ref name="comaptible">{{cite web |url=https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/software/page/licence_compatibility_and_interoperability |work=Open-Source Software  |title=Licence Compatibility and Interoperability |publisher=Joinup |quote=The licences for distributing free or open source software (FOSS) are divided in two families: permissive and copyleft. Permissive licences (BSD, MIT, X11, Apache, Zope) are generally compatible and interoperable with most other licences, tolerating to merge, combine or improve the covered code and to re-distribute it under many licences (including non-free or "proprietary"). |access-date=2015-05-30 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150617130550/https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/software/page/licence_compatibility_and_interoperability |archive-date=2015-06-17 }}</ref>
'''Licencija MIT''' (eng. ''MIT License'') je [[permisivna softverska licencija|permisivna]] [[softverska licencija]] koja potječe s [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology|Massachusettskog instituta za tehnologiju]] (MIT)<ref>{{Cite book |last=Rosen |first=Lawrence E. |title=Open Source Licensing: Software Freedom and Intellectual Property Law |publisher=[[Prentice Hall PTR]] |year=2005 |isbn=0-13-148787-6 |location=Upper Saddle River, NJ |oclc=56012651}}</ref> iz vremena kasnih 1980-ih. <ref name="history">{{cite web |last=Haff |first=Gordon |title=The mysterious history of the MIT License |url=https://opensource.com/article/19/4/history-mit-license |access-date=2019-07-30 |work=opensource.com |quote=The date? The best single answer is probably 1987. But the complete story is more complicated and even a little mysterious. [...] Precursors from 1985. The X Consortium or X11 License variant from 1987. Or the Expat License from 1998 or 1999.}}</ref> Kao permisivna licencija, stavlja malo ograničenja na ponovnu uporabu i ima visoku [[kompatibilnost licencije]].<ref name="opensoucecomp">{{cite web|url=http://opensource.com/business/14/1/what-license-should-i-use-open-source-project |quote=Permissive licensing simplifies things One reason the business world, and more and more developers [...], favor permissive licenses is in the simplicity of reuse. The license usually only pertains to the source code that is licensed and makes no attempt to infer any conditions upon any other component, and because of this there is no need to define what constitutes a derived work. I have also never seen a license compatibility chart for permissive licenses; it seems that they are all compatible.|title=Should I use a permissive license? Copyleft? Or something in the middle? |date=2014-01-28 |access-date=2015-05-30 |first=Marcus D. |last=Hanwell |publisher=opensource.com}}</ref><ref name="comaptible">{{cite web |url=https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/software/page/licence_compatibility_and_interoperability |work=Open-Source Software  |title=Licence Compatibility and Interoperability |publisher=Joinup |quote=The licences for distributing free or open source software (FOSS) are divided in two families: permissive and copyleft. Permissive licences (BSD, MIT, X11, Apache, Zope) are generally compatible and interoperable with most other licences, tolerating to merge, combine or improve the covered code and to re-distribute it under many licences (including non-free or "proprietary"). |access-date=2015-05-30 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150617130550/https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/software/page/licence_compatibility_and_interoperability |archive-date=2015-06-17 }}</ref>


Za razliku od softverskih licencija [[copyleft]]a, licencija MIT dopušta ponovnu uporabu unutar [[vlasnički softver|vlasničkog softvera]], pod uvjetom da sve kopije softvera ili njegov znatan dio sadrži kopiju uvjeta licencije MIT i također obavijest o autorskim pravima.<ref name="comaptible"/><ref>{{cite web |url=https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/264700/paid-software-includes-mit-licensed-library-does-that-put-my-app-under-mit-too |title=Paid software includes MIT licensed library, does that put my app under MIT too? |website=Software Engineering Stack Exchange |access-date=21 July 2021 }}</ref> Godine 2015.<ref name="github2015" /> i najmanje od 2020. do tijekom 2025.,<ref>{{Cite web |title=GitHub Innovation Graph |url=https://innovationgraph.github.com/global-metrics/licenses |access-date=2025-01-08 |website=innovationgraph.github.com |language=en}}</ref> licencija MIT je bila najpopularnija softverska licencija na [[GitHub]]u.
Za razliku od softverskih licencija [[copyleft]]a, licencija MIT dopušta ponovnu uporabu unutar [[vlasnički softver|vlasničkog softvera]], pod uvjetom da sve kopije softvera ili njegov znatan dio sadrži kopiju uvjeta licencije MIT i također obavijest o autorskim pravima.<ref name="comaptible"/><ref>{{cite web |url=https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/264700/paid-software-includes-mit-licensed-library-does-that-put-my-app-under-mit-too |title=Paid software includes MIT licensed library, does that put my app under MIT too? |website=Software Engineering Stack Exchange |access-date=21 July 2021 }}</ref> Godine 2015.<ref name="github2015">{{cite web|url=https://github.com/blog/1964-license-usage-on-github-com |quote=1 MIT 44.69%, 2 Other 15.68%|title=Open source license usage on GitHub.com |date=2015-03-09 |first=Ben |last=Balter |access-date=2015-11-21 |website=The GitHub Blog }}</ref> i najmanje od 2020. do tijekom 2025.,<ref>{{Cite web |title=GitHub Innovation Graph |url=https://innovationgraph.github.com/global-metrics/licenses |access-date=2025-01-08 |website=innovationgraph.github.com |language=en}}</ref> licencija MIT je bila najpopularnija softverska licencija na [[GitHub]]u.


Znameniti projekti koji rabe ovu licenciju su [[X Window System]], [[Ruby on Rails]], [[Node.js]], [[Lua]], [[jQuery]], [[.NET]], [[Angular (mrežni razvojni okvir)|Angular]] i [[React (knjižnica JavaScripta)|React]].
Znameniti projekti koji rabe ovu licenciju su [[X Window System]], [[Ruby on Rails]], [[Node.js]], [[Lua]], [[jQuery]], [[.NET]], [[Angular (mrežni razvojni okvir)|Angular]] i [[React (knjižnica JavaScripta)|React]].

Posljednja izmjena od 23. travanj 2026. u 12:23

Licencija MIT (eng. MIT License) je permisivna softverska licencija koja potječe s Massachusettskog instituta za tehnologiju (MIT)[1] iz vremena kasnih 1980-ih. [2] Kao permisivna licencija, stavlja malo ograničenja na ponovnu uporabu i ima visoku kompatibilnost licencije.[3][4]

Za razliku od softverskih licencija copylefta, licencija MIT dopušta ponovnu uporabu unutar vlasničkog softvera, pod uvjetom da sve kopije softvera ili njegov znatan dio sadrži kopiju uvjeta licencije MIT i također obavijest o autorskim pravima.[4][5] Godine 2015.[6] i najmanje od 2020. do tijekom 2025.,[7] licencija MIT je bila najpopularnija softverska licencija na GitHubu.

Znameniti projekti koji rabe ovu licenciju su X Window System, Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Lua, jQuery, .NET, Angular i React.

Izvori

  1. ↑ Rosen, Lawrence E. (2005) Open Source Licensing: Software Freedom and Intellectual Property Law.
  2. ↑ The mysterious history of the MIT License. opensource.com 0. Pristupljeno 2019-07-30.
  3. ↑ Should I use a permissive license? Copyleft? Or something in the middle?. opensource.com 0. 28. siječnja 2014. Pristupljeno 2015-05-30.
  4. ↑ 4,0 4,1 Licence Compatibility and Interoperability. Open-Source Software 0. Pristupljeno 2015-05-30.
  5. ↑ Paid software includes MIT licensed library, does that put my app under MIT too?. Software Engineering Stack Exchange 0. Pristupljeno 21 July 2021.
  6. ↑ Open source license usage on GitHub.com. The GitHub Blog 0. 9. ožujka 2015. Pristupljeno 2015-11-21.
  7. ↑ GitHub Innovation Graph. innovationgraph.github.com 0. Pristupljeno 2025-01-08.
Dobavljeno iz "https://enciklopedija.cc/index.php?title=Licencija_MIT&oldid=760569"